ARCECONF Conference Scientific Review Panel

The ARCECONF Scientific Committee is composed of experienced researchers and academics representing various disciplines. They assess submissions, give constructive academic feedback, and support productive scholarly conversations.

Conference Scientific Committee

Members of the Scientific Review Panel

Professor Ancuța Rotaru

Professor Ancuța Rotaru

Faculty of Civil Engineering and Building Services, Department of Transportation Infrastructure and Foundations, Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iași, Romania


Dr.Vitalii Ishchenko

Dr. Vitalii Ishchenko

Vinnytsia National Technical University, Faculty of Construction, Civil and Environmental Engineering, Ukraine


Dr.Said Easa

Dr. Said Easa

Department of Civil Engineering,Toronto Metropolitan University


Prof.Kitapatr Dhabhalabutr

Asst. Prof. Kitapatr Dhabhalabutr

Faculty of Architecture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand


MOHAMMAD REZA BAGERZADEH KARIMI

Asst. Prof. Dr. Mohammad Reza Bagerzadeh Karimi

Faculty member in the civil engineering department at Cyprus International University


Dr.Mohammad Arif Kamal

Dr. Mohammad Arif Kamal

Architecture Section, Aligarh Muslim University, India


Ozkaynak

Dr. Hasan Ozkaynak Beykent

University Head of Civil Engineering Department, turkey


Robabeh Jazaei

Dr. Robabeh Jazaei

Department of Physics and Engineering, Slippery Rock University of Pennsylvania, USA


Fedaravicius

Prof. Dr. Algimantas Fedaravičius

Department of Transport Engineering, Kaunas University of Technology, Lithuania


Dr.Firas Al Mahmoud

Dr. Firas Al Mahmoud

Civil Engineering Department, Lorraine University, France


Joining the Scientific Review Panel

PhD-qualified academics may apply when they have a relevant research record and sufficient experience in academic work.

Academic Role and Recognized Organization

Candidates should hold an Assistant Professor role or a more senior appointment. Their institution must be a recognized university, higher education institution, or research center.

English Communication and Review Quality

Candidates must have strong English communication skills. Their reviews should be objective, fair, and completed independently. Feedback must be constructive and meet accepted academic integrity standards.

Expected Reviewing Volume

The expected workload is usually three to four submission reviews each year. Assignments can be planned flexibly around the member's other commitments.

Still have questions?

Membership Recognition and Opportunities

Acknowledgment of Scholarly Work: Members receive a certificate when each conference ends. This document recognizes their review work and participation in related academic activities.
Links with Global Researchers: Membership supports contact with scholars, researchers, practitioners, and specialists from different countries and areas of expertise.
Discounted Registration Options: Scientific Committee members may have access to discounted registration for future conference programs.
Editorial Board Possibilities: Members may also receive consideration for editorial board appointments in journals published by partner publishers.

Apply to the ARCECONF Scientific Review Panel

Experienced academics are invited to apply if they can support the Scientific Committee's work.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Fill Out the Application Form and Be a Member of the Scientific Committee!

Full Name
Accepted file types: jpg, jpeg, png, gif.
Max. file size: 128 MB.
Accepted file types: pdf, doc, docx

Receive the latest news

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Select Participation Type